Do you really think ānanda/sāriputta/kassapa/anuruddha/upāli were no brain to ask what they/their students can't understand while they were listening and memorizing sutta from Buddha?
If they were having brain while listening Buddha's sutta, where were their questions and answers? On the other hand, where were their books?
Are their books abhidhamma, parivāra, paṭisambhidhāmagga, ancient atthakathā, right?
Or Buddha's followers can keep/memorize tipitaka through 45 years without any questions/books/comment/aspects? Is it possible?
Can you find the answer? Or you just want to discredit abhidhamma by every way you can without the possible fact?
Commentary wrote Abhidhamma authored by Ven. Sāriputta, after he listened the abhidhamma's summary from the Buddha. Ven. Sāriputta also authored KN. Paṭisambhidāmagga as well.
Commentary wrote 'Only ancient commentary were being at 1st saṅgāyanā'. When Buddhaghosa combined all commentaries, ancient commentary and singhala commentaries, together, he separate them clearly. I still can notice which text is the ancient commentary, and which is not.
More description:
https://unmixedtheravada.blogspot.com/s ... hidhammist
https://unmixedtheravada.blogspot.com/s ... el/History
No comments:
Post a Comment